From : Daryl Chin
Subject : bresson on dvd
Date : May 30, 2004 9:38:29 PM MDT
To : Trond Trondsen / robert-bresson.com
New Yorker Films was the slowest to put anything out on DVD, though many of
their titles were on VHS for a long time. However, the fact that both A MAN
ESCAPED and LANCELOT DU LAC have been transferred to DVD in a way which is
defective (using a PAL master instead of a careful film-to-digital transfer)
seems to be par for the course for many New Yorker titles (one of their
first DVD releases, Alain Resnais's MON ONCLE D'AMERIQUE, is plainly
hideous, with a totally cropped image, and very bad, washed-out color). That
said, I agree with your assessment, that A MAN ESCAPED is tolerable (it's
like watching a good, not-pristine, not-restored old print), but LANCELOT DU
LAC is rather difficult. One of the only consolations is that Rialto
obtained the rights to AU HASARD, BALTHAZAR and MOUCHETTE, and any further
home-video transfers will be handled by Criterion for those titles.
(At one time, New Yorker had the rights to A MAN ESCAPED, PICKPOCKET, THE
TRIAL OF JOAN OF ARC, AU HASARD BALTHAZAR, MOUCHETTE, UNE FEMME DOUCE, FOUR
NIGHTS OF A DREAMER, LANCELOT DU LAC, LE DIABLE PROBABLEMENT, and L'ARGENT.
One of the things that is important to remember is that, in the 1950s
through the mid-1960s, there were numerous small distributors in North
America; some of the companies i remember include Films-Around-the-World,
Astor, Lux, Pathe, Union; for 16mm distribution, Audio-Brandon was one of
the biggest companies. As many of these companies folded, their backlists
became available, and there was a period when New Yorker Films was actively
trying to obtain many "classic" titles that were on the market, such as
Godard's BREATHLESS and MY LIFE TO LIVE. New Yorker Films started in the
mid-1960s, when Dan Talbot realized that there was no distributor for
several important films which he wanted to play at his New Yorker Theater in
New York City; one of the first titles to which he obtained the rights was
Bernardo Bertolucci's BEFORE THE REVOLUTION, and he followed it with Chris
Marker's LA JETEE and THE KOUMIKO MYSTERY.)
The problem is that the secondary market (16mm prints for schools,
educational showcases, film societies, etc.), which was the big market for
New Yorker Films, has vanished, and New Yorker Films did not want to rush
into the home video market, which is what the secondary market has evolved
into. They waited so long, and other companies (Fox-Lorber, which evolved
into Winstar, and is now Wellspring, as an example) took up the slack,
making arrangements for home video rights to films which New Yorker Films
had the theatrical (35mm and 16mm) rights to; this happened with most of the
Fassbinder titles (all of which had been with New Yorker Films). This has
wrecked havoc on New Yorker Films, and because they are now playing
"catch-up" in terms of the home video market, specifically the DVD market,
they are trying to cut corners as much as possible. Their "trump" is the
importance of their titles (in terms of Godard, for example, New Yorker
Films still has the rights to LA CHINOISE and WEEKEND; in terms of Bertolucci,
they still have BEFORE THE REVOLUTION and THE SPIDER'S STRATEGEM; in terms
of Chris Marker, they still have THE KOUMIKO MYSTERY and SANS SOLEIL; in
terms of Bresson, they still have PICKPOCKET, THE TRIAL OF JOAN OF ARC,
THE DEVIL PROBABLY, L'ARGENT, in addition to the two titles that have just
been put on DVD), but it has become a serious problem.
The whole difficulty of the home video market and New Yorker Films's very
slow response to the "challenge" has been a bone of contention: it was the
leverage that brought the Fassbinder catalogue to Winstar (now Wellspring).
I should also point out that, last week, in The New York Times, Dave Kehr
was very pointed and direct in his criticism of the New Yorker DVDs of A MAN
ESCAPED and LANCELOT DU LAC. He discussed the problem of cropping, the
problem of time compression, the problem of "ghosting" and, in general, the
relatively undistinguished quality of the transfers, especially in light of
the films' historical and aesthetic importance. [ Kehr's fine capsule review
appeared in the Tuesday May 25, 2004 issue of the NYTimes, Late Edition,
Section E, Page 6, Column 4. Kehr's findings are remarkably similar to
those of robert-bresson.com. —Ed. ]
Daryl Chin
|